They Can’t Even Do a False Flag Right: Russia Calls US Out Inconsistencies in Latest "Chemical Attack"
It's obvious without an in-depth analysis. Authors of false stories are constantly caught red-handed. They are scrutinized frame by frame but in vain. Now it’s about the outcome of today's phone conversation between UK Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson, and US Acting Secretary of State, John Sullivan. The attack carries the signs of previous chemical attacks conducted by the Assad regime. Nobody specifies what 'the previous attacks' are, given that the alleged use of toxic agents was never investigated. Instead, they're demanding with foam at the mouth to hold Damascus accountable for it. The pattern is common.
Besides, speaking about foam at the mouth. It's one of the symptoms of being affected by a chemical weapon. White Helmets claim to have seen it with their own eyes. But, traditionally, there are dozens of inconsistencies.
Ekaterina Grigorova has found them out.
- Did they forget to put on gas masks again?
- Yes, at the beginning they're wearing no gas masks. And they have no protection against chemical weapons at all, and there are many other awkward things. The first one is the barrel bomb itself the video of which was posted by White Helmets on Twitter. It allegedly pierced concrete reinforcement, with the tail unit intact. The barrel itself remains intact too. How did the toxic agent inside it vaporize?
Some other videos are controversial as well. White Helmets are running in a possibly contaminated zone without chemical protection equipment and gas masks. Besides, everybody in the shooting area doesn't seem to be aware of what's going on. This guy, for example, knows nothing about the attack and is in no hurry.
No reliable data is available about toxic agents allegedly used in the attack. Speculations include chlorine and organophosphorus compounds, and in both cases wearing no gas mask outdoors or indoors is fatal. An instantly fatal concentration of chlorine is 28 mg/m3, The lethal concentration of GB gas is 0.1 mg/m3. 0.007 mg of V gas per 1 m3 causes death too. What is also awkward about the footage is the way the victims are treated. They're hosed, which is useless in case of a chemical attack. The only thing that can help is a toxicide injection. While helping a victim of a real chemical attack, a specialist must wear a gas mask. They can remove it safely only after decontamination.
The most terrible footage was made in the building where the victims of an alleged chemical attack are. White Helmets are supposed to be aware of mass casualties, but the rescuers, fortunately, wearing gas masks this time, have no gloves and other chemical protection equipment. Even chlorine, considered not the most hazardous toxic agent, affects not only respiration organs but also eyes and skin. As for organophosphorus compounds, even clothes can't protect from them.
ICRC: "Chemical warfare agents fall on the body, hair, skin, clothes. They continue cross contaminating elsewhere, and it harms the soldiers trying to help those contaminated, it harms the medical staff trying to help the victims".
Toxic agents can't disappear from the environment. For example, it takes chlorine 3 hours to evaporate from an earth-road, 6 hours from grass, and it remains in the urban area for about 16 hours. Organophosphate chemicals are even more stable. For example, saman remains lethal for 24 hours, and V gas will remain hazardous for about 3 weeks. But here a toxic agent seemed to be selective, without harming those who was filming all that. Though, they should have got contaminated if it's not fake or a Halloween performance.
Nowadays it's not very hard or time-consuming to stick or draw any bruises, skin infection, ulceration. The easiest thing is foam at the mouth, it was known even in the days of the Inquisition. But having prepared a shooting area, one can safely come there with a camera, such a chemical attack won't affect the witnesses. Thanks. It was Ekaterina Grigorova about the art of falsification.